5pm BST / Midday ET
Tennessee man cites church's liberal values as reason for shooting
- guardian.co.uk,
- Monday July 28 2008
A man who shot and killed two parishioners during a children's play at a Tennessee church yesterday attacked the congregation because of its outspoken socially liberal and gay-friendly beliefs, police said.
The 58-year-old unemployed engineer accused in the Sunday morning attack at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church, was driven to bloodshed in part by his "stated hatred for the liberal movement" as well as his hatred for gays, said Knoxville, Tennessee, police chief Sterling Owen. "We're certainly investigating it as a hate crime."
According to police, at about 10am yesterday Jim Adkisson strode into the church sanctuary as 200 parishioners watched a children's production of the musical "Annie". He pulled a .12 gauge shotgun from a guitar case and fire three rounds, killing two adults, police said. One of the dead was shot as he attempted to shield others from gunfire, witnesses said. Parishioners then tackled Adkisson and held him until police arrived.
"I do not believe he expected to leave there alive," Owen said. He said Adkisson had been planning the attack for a week, but added
"I'm sure this is something that's been building a long time."
Investigators described Adkisson as a former member of an Army airborne unit who trained as a mechanical engineer and had held jobs across the country. He had apparently been out of work since 2006, and believed liberals were taking jobs he should have, Owen said. Investigators are not aware of any affiliation with a church or with any known hate groups. Adkisson had no next of kin or family, police said.
According to a four-page manifesto police found in his SUV in the church parking lot, Adkisson believed the church to be a bastion of liberalism in an otherwise socially conservative area of eastern Tennessee.
"That church had received some publicity in the recent past regarding its liberal stance on things," Owen said, "and that is at least one of the issues we believe caused that church to be targeted".
The church's website speaks of its "long and rich history of taking stands for social justice," and said it has fought since the 1950s for racial desegregation, fair wages and equal treatment for women and homosexuals. It provides sanctuary for political refugees and founded a chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. The church hosts social events for gay and lesbian teens.
The FBI logged 7,722 hate crimes in 2006, the most recent year for which complete statistics are available. That is down slightly from 2000. Hate crime attacks at churches are rare, according to FBI statistics. Only 4% in 2006 occurred at places of worship.
An FBI official said federal law enforcement officials were investigating whether to prosecute Adkisson for forcibly preventing the free expression of worship, a federal civil rights violation.
Adkisson is charged with first-degree murder and is held on $1m bail.
Right Wing Blogosphere Completely Ignores Domestic Terrorism In KnoxvilleBy: Blue Texan Monday July 28, 2008 10:31 am |
As Dave notes below, some wingnut crazy shot up a Unitarian church in Tennessee, killing 2 and wounding 7. His hatred of liberals and gays was the motive.
What's notable about this is the complete radio silence on the right.
Almost exactly two years ago, there was another tragic shooting at a place of worship -- and they were all over it. Just look at this breathless, obsessively updated Michelle Malkin post.
The difference? The shooter in 2006 was a Muslim.
Challenging Hate Radio: A Guide for Activists
1. Force yourself to listen to it. We know it's tough, but someone's got to do it.
2. Document it. Sometimes only a talkshow host's loyal following hears the most outrageous thing that he says. You need to be able to document exactly what was said (and when it was said). Record the show, and be sure to label and date your tapes.
3. Keep track of the worst statements. Transcribe the most offensive comments [if possible]. Transcripts are easier and cheaper to distribute than audio tapes. Having a one-page list of quotes educates people and motivates them to action quickly. A "worst of" tape can also be very valuable.
4. Inform others who will take action. If you have a group of people interested, setting up an email list, or a quick response phone or fax tree, is a good idea.
5. Call in to the show. Call the on-air line during the show and try to challenge the racism, sexism or homophobia calmly and directly. It often doesn't take much to demonstrate the absurdity of bigoted arguments. If several people call in, it can change the entire show.
6. Write letters to station managers or owners. If the host doesn't respond to criticism, those who run the station need to know how offensive the program is. If you are part of a group or coalition, you might want to request a meeting as well.
7. Notify other outlets. Newspapers, non-commercial radio stations or other media might be interested in stories about talk radio. Send a press release including a few of the worst quotes and the dates they aired. Be prepared to offer a tape for documentation.
8. Build a coalition. Contact organizations that have a particular interest in challenging hate speech—like civil rights, religious, feminist and gay rights groups—and have organizational resources devoted to the issue.
9. Organize a demonstration. If you have an active coalition, a demonstration can draw attention to the problem and put pressure on the station at the same time. Large signs or placards and a one-page flyer with some of the worst on-air statements by the host and your coalition's demands will educate passersby.
10. Keep the pressure on. Even if the station doesn't balance the hate-jock, or allow an on-air discussion of hate speech, just publicizing bigoted statements changes the terms of debate. Hate flourishes when other views are not heard. By challenging it as often as possible, you diminish the ignorance that is necessary to racism, sexism and homophobia.
(Toward that end, here is something well documented that millions have seen and heard just over this weekend's news cycle.~java)
- Hatewatch | Southern Poverty Law Center -
Extremist Steve Sailer is Source for CNN’s ‘Black in America’ Series
Posted By David Holthouse On July 25, 2008 @ 2:42 pm In Academic Racism, Anti-Black, Media Extremism | 33 Comments
As part of its ongoing [1] “Black in America” project, CNN posted a [2] story to its website earlier this week titled “Could an Obama presidency hurt black Americans?” Credited to CNN correspondent John Blake, the piece quotes the wit and wisdom of Steve Sailer, identified only as “a columnist for [3] The American Conservative magazine.”
Specifically, the CNN story quotes a column by Sailer first published last year in which he opined that Obama offers voters “White guilt repellent.”
“So many whites want to be able to say, ‘I’m not one of them, those bad whites. … Hey, I voted for a black guy for president,’” Sailer wrote.
What the CNN article fails to note is that in addition to writing columns and movie reviews for The American Conservative, Sailer is the [4] founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute, a neo-eugenics online discussion forum where right-wing journalists and race scientists have promoted selective breeding of the human species. He also writes frequently for the anti-immigrant hate site [5] Vdare.com, named for the first white child born in America, and runs a website, isteve.com.
Sailer’s website is rife with primitive stereotypes. On it, Sailer mocks professional golfer Annika Sorenstam for having well-developed muscles and claims that Asian men have a hard time finding dates because they look “less masculine” than other men.
Last January, on the hate site vdare.com, Sailer [6] labeled Obama a “wigger.”
“He’s a remarkably exotic variety of the faux African-American, but a wigger nonetheless,” Sailer wrote. “Even genetically, Obama, whose East African descent is apparent in his unusual features, has only a distant relationship to the West Africans who are the ancestors of almost all African-Americans.” To illustrate his point, Sailer used photos of Obama side-by-side with Jesse Jackson and the rapper Ludacris, “both of whom have conventional West African features.”
Assessing the tragic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in September 2005, Sailer [7] wrote, “The plain fact is that they [black Americans] tend to possess poorer native judgment than members of better-educated groups. Thus they need stricter moral guidance from society.”
This isn’t the only time in recent history that CNN has turned to an unabashed bigot for commentary on controversial issues in America while cloaking the source’s full identity.
In October 2006, CNN medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta [8] reported on a study by [9] J. Phillpe Rushton that purported to show that men, on average, are more intelligent than women. Gupta identified Rushton only as a professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario. Since 2002, Rushton has been the head of the [10] Pioneer Fund, a pro-eugenics foundation that funds the research of academic racists like [11] Jared Taylor and Rushton, who himself has received over $1 million in Pioneer grants. Among Rushton’s findings are that on average blacks have larger genitals, breasts and buttocks, characteristics that, according to Rushton’s “research,” have an inverse relationship to brain size and, thus, intelligence.
Then last April, CNN host Paula Zahn [12] invited white supremacist James Edwards to participate in a live on-air panel discussion of “self-segregation” in America. Edwards, a self-proclaimed crusader for the white race, is the co-founder of the [13] Political Cesspool, a Memphis, Tenn.-based AM radio show whose guest lineup is a rogue’s gallery of prominent figures on the radical right, including former Klan leader [14] David Duke, anti-Semitic attorney [15] Edgar Steele and the neo-Nazi teen singing duo [16] Prussian Blue.
On that occasion, CNN identified Edwards rather sparingly as a “talk radio show host.”
No comments:
Post a Comment